So the Flea is over, and we've headed on.
It had its moments, both good and well, to be perfectly frank, rather pathetic.
In the positive column; , stumbling across an old friend, spending a few brief minutes in the bullwhip lounge, interesting discussions between Sir and I sparked by workshops we went to, silk, flax, and hemp ropes, a new singletail, and even some new leather, (for later, that I've not earned yet), and a major 'plus', Providence, Rhode Island and the hotels, convention center, etc.
A good hotel experience can go a long way towards serving as a bulwark against not such good parts of an event. Providence itself was also a real win, and doubly so in light of the Fetish Fair Flea's previous experiences in Massachusetts.
By way of a middle column, somewhere between positives and negatives, or more accurately as a mix of both, we were fortunate enough to be able to attend all three of Midori's workshops; "Asian Rituals for Western Lovers", "Bondage Outside the Box", and "Make 'em Blush, Make 'em Squirm: Erotic Humiliation Play". All three were useful in terms of some of the conversations Sir and I ended up having, both good and bad.
But part of the real 'mixed bag'-ness of the three workshops was the 'massive herd' mentality that led to long lines to get in, tons of people, and naturally, the settings the workshops were in provided very few seats that actually afforded full views of what was going on. Thus, most audience members heard the presentations but could not see much of what was happening. Such could have been avoided in several ways, but for each of the three workshops, the same scenario played out.
In the negative column; certain aspects of some of the presentations, Some of the ways 'pros' were just woven through the event (in not so good ways), poorly woven whip handles, and I suppose my personal 'low' award for the event- a presenter who couldn't be bothered to show up on time for her own workshop due to... broken nails and an emergency quest for a manicurist. This from a woman whose website says, and I quote "don't waste my time", perhaps she might consider taking her own advice. (I've no qualms about naming names, as the workshop and presenter was publicly available on the FFF XXX website- "Mistress LunaSea")
Now I've seen everything. Suffice it to say, we felt no need to 'bottom' to her by waiting around to see whether or not she'd show up- so in the end I've no idea whether any form of the workshop managed to go forward or not, if it did, it went forward late and without us.
No presenter should ever need be tracked down by the event organizers AFTER the time their workshop was due to start, only to be reminded they had a workshop. D'oh. No, I wasn't impressed.
Sir and I also intentionally wandered into the 101 style "BDSM for beginners" for a number of reasons, not the least of which being trying to understand the 'intake path' many of today's newcomers are experiencing. (By way of readily admitting my own biases here, I've taught 101 workshops in the past.) I may or may not eventually get to writing about such, but for the time being, simply consider this another tidbit we both felt best deserved the negative column- and unfortunately the ramifications of such will continue to echo forward. More so still, in that this particular presentation has been an entry point for people in many times and places.
If I sound cynical and somewhat jaded, it's only because in some ways, I most certainly am.
On the other hand, as we somehow almost always seem to, Sir and I still managed to make some very high quality "us" time, which makes even broken nail absurdity somehow not only bearable, but something I'm just able to dismiss as the pathetic current state of affairs in some corners of 'The Scene'.
While I'm still glad I went, I am not sure I'd feel the need to return in the near future. That may be more a reflection of where Sir and I stand, though. The workshops we attended in many ways felt very 'beginner', and most of what was available at the market itself were things, and often dealers that in our travels we had seen over and over. That's not necessarily a bad thing, but for us, either visiting the brick and mortar stores when possible, or using online ordering takes care of most of what we would want from such.
Fortunately, though, there was the happy exception or two. I spend time at marketplaces like this looking for the unique, the unusual, and the custom. Radiance Bound for example was doing some lovely metallic work, very appropriate to formal Leather occasions, and some of Madame Butterfly's handmade silk rope came home with us.
The final thing to note about the FFF is that for 'outsiders' (those from out of New England for example), there is no main dungeon or 'play party' as part of the event, so what goes on, usually happens via pre-existing loose networks of friends or NE Leather organizations in private spaces. Without an 'in', you'll have to resort to a private evening in your own hotel room.
While this was absolutely fine for Sir and I (and yes, had we wanted to attend a party, that could have been arranged, we were not interested in such, this time, anyway) other people may find the 'barriers to entry' a bit high. It would be better to get to know people and build ties to organizations prior to the event if gaining an invitation to a party is important to you.
*** Addendum- there was an article Sunday in the Providence Journal- "Sex-Toy Trade Show Sports a Global Face".
I'm not altogether sure quite what I make of the article's angle, the 'sex toy biz'/"trade show", but apparently that was how the Journal understood the event. Clearly, they missed the fact that while the shopping is a major part of the event, what with being in the name and all, the real action had little to do with vendors. Most participants spent time in workshops or in hotel rooms practicing said newly acquired skills.
To simplify the flea down to a story about the American vs. Chinese sex toy industry and label the event a 'trade show' was just, well bizarro-world, though it certainly says a great deal about how 'outsiders' sometimes see us or comprehend us.
Monday, January 14, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
"Make 'em Blush, Make 'em Squirm: Erotic Humiliation Play".
if that was the same workshop she was doing a coupla-ten years ago - it was probably great. I loved it. learned a lot.
Don't know if it was or not.
Normally said workshop runs about 2 1/2 hours, and this was roughly 2, so a few things were cut.
I actually found myself understanding what she was advocating, but disagreeing strongly with the gist of where she advocates 'aiming' so to speak.
Then again, I only do such with people I know damn well, and have deep responsibility to, and understand some of the intricacies of.
For her audience and it being somewhat of an introductory class, I can understand her pointing people the directions she did- doubly so if people engaging in such would be doing 'casual play' or with unfamiliar partners.
Then of course, there's also the broader culture we live in and presenters being in certain position in relation to liability etc. Presenters would never want to advocate 'tinkering around in there' where it's really fragile to an audience like this at a venue like this.
Nothing said is happening in isolation. To say nothing of the fact that some portion of people in the audience are going to take things 'the wrong way' no matter how well the workshop is taught.
But with someone, when you know one another TOO damn well (although there's always more!) hitting precisely the buttons most related to how an individual views themselves can be exactly where the heat is so to speak.
But working that way also requires a lot of work on the 'coming back out' (as well as over extended periods of time, years even) too. And that's all too often overlooked.
In any case, it's one of the few places I've found myself in somewhat outright disagreement with her workshops- although again, humiliation isn't something I'd even touch with another person I wasn't in a certain kind of relation to.
Her workshop for what it was, was probably more appropriate.
My only concern, is that when she labels the kind of work I do as 'bad' or something one should 'never' do, people doing some of what I do may get labeled 'wrong' or 'dangerous' in that she's setting what may eventually become community expectations through her use of absolutes that may be more apt for entry level or 'casual', but are not universally applicable.
I'm concerned that some people may mistake her 'bad' and 'never' as absolutes, when what they really are is nothing more than her opinion, stated in a certain place and time in relation to certain crowds, etc.
All of which is happening in, as she herself stated, an area where there's a dearth of information to learn from. Which then unfortunately puts even more weight upon what she teaches as it's one of the 'few things out there'.
Communities are building perceptions of safety and 'how things are done' around workshops like this, and it concerns me. Particularly in that there is no 'one way' about how to do so much of this. It really comes down to each couple or other configuration trying these things together as to what constitutes 'good' or 'bad' let alone 'wrong' ways of doing such.
Teaching communities that certain things are 'never' to be done, only means that those of who do them get marginalized and feared.
Which while not surprising in a hyper "safetly" focused culture, still avoids the basic fact of there being no genuine 100% "safe" for the having. All of this carries risks. Mitigating certain risks is sometimes all that can be done.
But risk and fear is also part of the why some of us do what we do. I don't think 100% "safe" gets some of us off at all. Going into the dark places to do things that yes, do carry risk, and a willingness to acknowledge such (while behind the scenes mitigating some of it/the 'worst' of it) is vital to enjoyment for some.
That at minimum belief that something is at stake, goes to the core of why we do what we do.
(Sorry, didn't mean to write a novel here. I just walked out of the workshop at the end thinking 'huh, matter of time before more experienced people are gonna get squished by some of those absolutes.')
I just stumbled on your site. I have so enjoyed reading it. I am co-founder of Crusty. Old. LeatherDykes. I did a little work on our web site and I went to test it with a google search and I saw that you had a link to us! Whoo hoo! We know we've hit the big time now! But I'm glad I happened on your site anyway. I am really enjoying reading your thoughts!
Welcome Hype-Jersey!
(Been reading your stuff here for a bit now via a mailing list. Which is how I took note of your page initially. I've often found myself in deep agreement with things you've said.)
Can't tell you how much I LOVE the notion of Crusty Old Leather Dykes!!! (and the *cough* structure *cough* thereof.) Had I been anywhere near Philly, I might have made my way towards the recent COLD event. Unfortunately, I was traveling at the time. Perhaps at some future something or other our paths may cross.
In any case, very glad you've found my little corner of the universe and find it of interest.
I don't update as frequently as I should, but I suppose I tend to aim for quality, not quantity.
Post a Comment